Archive

This is my archive

Comments on Proposed Revocation of the 2020 Reconsideration, and Affirmation of the Appropriate and Necessary Supplemental Finding, 87 Fed. Reg. 7624 (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0794)

On April 11, 2022, the Emmett Clinic submitted comments supporting the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposal to reaffirm earlier findings underlying the agency’s regulation of mercury and other toxic air pollutant emissions from coal-fired power plants. The comments were filed on behalf of a group of leading scientific experts in…

April 11, 2022

Comments on Rescinding the Rule on “Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Benefits and Costs in the Clean Air Act Rulemaking Process,” 86 Fed. Reg 26,406 (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0044)

On June 14, 2021, the Clinic submitted comments on behalf of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and National Parks Conservation Association supporting EPA’s decision to rescind the Trump-era regulation regarding the use of cost-benefit analyses in Clean Air Act rulemakings. The letter supported EPA’s conclusion that the rulemaking was unnecessary, unresponsive…

June 14, 2021

Comments On Proposed Rule: “Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Benefits and Costs In The Clean Air Act Rulemaking Process,” 85 Fed. Reg 35,612, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0044

On August 3, 2020, the Clinic submitted comments on behalf of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and the National Parks Conservation Association on the Environmental Protection Agency’s Proposed Rule “Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Benefits and Costs in the Clean Air Act Rulemaking Process.” The comments urge EPA to withdraw…

August 03, 2020